John Teague's Blog - All Comments

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

jcteague — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:34:37 GMT

yes, we're using some of that and what is in the fubuMVC rake scripts

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

Peter Mounce — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:44:19 GMT

Now _that_ sounds useful!

You might also be interested in rake-dotnet...? github.com/.../rake-dotnet

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

jcteague — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:08:07 GMT

Believe me, I am looking forward to IronRuby as much as any other .Net Ruby wannabe. But, unless it is deployable as a dll (which it should), you will still have the problem of including IronRuby inside your tools folder in your project.

Having a completely self-contained project with dependencies is very important. It's what keeps your automation going.

We'll see!!

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

mendicant — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:14:58 GMT

ANother thing to keep in mind is that IronRuby seems to be coming pretty fast, and I bet that if you can run Rails on IronRuby that you'll be able to run Rake. Then you can have your .Net spin :D

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

jcteague — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:40:50 GMT

You should leave this comment on Stephen's blog. I haven't played with it. But from he has told me, yes this is the full version of rails. From his description, you install or gem everything you need and then run the allinoneruby script to create the executable

re: Ruby and Rake as an executable

Ryan Kelley — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:14:21 GMT

Is this a full featured version of Ruby? We are using Ruby and rake for build tasks only, but we have some fairly complex stuff in our rake scripts, such as XML manipulation, and interfacing with various external system utils. Is this still possible with the self contained version?

Weekly Link Post 95 « Rhonda Tipton’s WebLog

Weekly Link Post 95 « Rhonda Tipton’s WebLog — Mon, 25 May 2009 22:24:09 GMT

Pingback from Weekly Link Post 95 « Rhonda Tipton’s WebLog

re: Austin Code Camp 09

Addie Gisser — Fri, 08 May 2009 11:42:20 GMT

The link to register for Code Camp is broken.

www.adnug.org/.../New

does not work.

Submit Your Austin Code Camp Sessions Now

John Teague's Blog — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:27:52 GMT

The deadline for submitting session is April 19. If you want to speak at this year’s code camp

re: Resharper templates: Don't forget the Macros

Donn — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:28:09 GMT

Cool stuff, but if you use var for everything then it kind of falls down. :( But cool stuff though !

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009 — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:53:47 GMT

Pingback from Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009 — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:53:47 GMT

Pingback from Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for April 6, 2009

Resharper templates: Don't forget the Macros - John Teague's Blog -

DotNetShoutout — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:28:01 GMT

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout

ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1

ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1 — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:43:33 GMT

Pingback from ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1

re: The MVC Template Team Got It Right

Hadi Hariri — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:54:17 GMT

I doubt they'll change anyhing for RTM because it's in RC, but it would be really cool if they would make the whole AccountController thing a minor little tickbox on the New App wizard. If they did the same with the MS.Ajax libs, even better, not to mention also prompting to create the scafolding when creating CRUD operations.

They could have added so much with such little effort.