Colin Ramsay - All Comments

Anti-Patterns and Worst Practices – Monster Objects

Chris Missal — Thu, 28 May 2009 23:30:18 GMT

Monster objects (or God objects ) know too much, or do too much; monster objects are nasty beasts. The

re: PTOM: Breaking Free from HttpContext

mycall — Wed, 27 May 2009 23:01:09 GMT

Here is another workaround to embedding HttpContext.Current.Session..

public class ContextStorage

{

[ThreadStatic]

private static Dictionary<string, object> threadContext = new Dictionary<string, object>();

public static bool IsWebContext()

{

try

{

return (HttpContext.Current != null);

}

catch (HttpException) { }

return false;

}

public static IDictionary Items

{

get

{

return IsWebContext() ? HttpContext.Current.Items : threadContext;

}

Weekly Web Nuggets #63

Code Monkey Labs — Sun, 17 May 2009 02:17:13 GMT

Pick of the week: Flash vs. Silverlight – What Suites Your Needs Best? General Castle Windsor 2.0 RTM Released : Ayende Rahien announces the 2.0 release of the Windsor project. Windows API Code Pack for Microsoft .NET Framework : This latest drop of the

ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1

ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1 — Thu, 07 May 2009 05:44:22 GMT

Pingback from ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for May 6, 2009

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for May 6, 2009 — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:04:51 GMT

Pingback from Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for May 6, 2009

Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #341

Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #341 — Wed, 06 May 2009 07:35:09 GMT

Pingback from Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #341

PTOM: Breaking Free from HttpContext - Colin Ramsay -

DotNetShoutout — Wed, 06 May 2009 04:10:57 GMT

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout

Pablo’s Topic of the Month – May 2009 Edition

That Other Guy . . . — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:54:36 GMT

Have you ever read a blog post about TDD, Dependency Injection, or some other concept and thought, “Sounds

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for January 27, 2009

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for January 27, 2009 — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:23:05 GMT

Pingback from Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for January 27, 2009

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

Brad Mead — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:08:22 GMT

Nevermind... reading the referenced "forgottenskies" link: :))

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

Brad Mead — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:46:13 GMT

Or is the Subscriber->SubscriberInfo relationship "grease" for the extension method/ linq usage? Like a thin object graph

i.e. Child.ForName("subscriber") roughly equates to "give me child of the one named subscriber (SubscriberInfo?)

Are Child.ForName, .Eq, Attrib.ForName MicroKernel Registration API extension methods?

Sorry about the dumb questions. I am deciding on IoC containers and evaluating code-based configuration paradigms. I think I understand how to leverage your approach on down the road - I thought I might as well poke the unknowns. I am also a little linq-naive.

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

Brad Mead — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:10:27 GMT

OT: @Colin

Just few a questions in regard to the class encapsulation where Subscriber encapsulates SubscriberInfo. I typically warn myself off of usage like this because I don't understand the qualities.

Is this implementation:

a) a pattern of which I am unaware

b) Does it afford quality to the container or the fluency framework?

c)?

Thanks, Brad

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

Tuna Toksoz — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:02:58 GMT

i am just trying some tricks,

Component.For<IService>()

.ImplementedBy<PublisherService>() .Subscribers(Subscriber.ForComponent<PublisherService,SubscriberService>("subscriberId",(x, y) => x.ServiceStarted += y.Subscriber));

This is possible since I'm using lambda's as delegates. I think i can process it to get the right stuff: which subscribed to what but this ForComponent<Pub,Sub> part disturbs me as it is not necessary.

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

cramsay — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:40:58 GMT

Valeriu, I agree but as Tuna has mentioned I'm not sure if that would be possible in this context. If someone can point us in the right direction....?

re: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring

Tuna Toksoz — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:17:05 GMT

There is one thing that I forgot about: events can only be used on the left of += operator and unfortunately an assignment operator cannot be part of an expresssion. Agh!!!